SIMERPU RESEARCH · SOURCE RECAP
How Section 105 Medical Reimbursement Plans Save on Taxes
SIMERPU recap and commentary: Mardy Gould
Opened — main text retrieved
Quick recap
Vendor overview explains conventional §105 MERPs and HRAs, reimbursement of medical expenses and nondiscrimination requirements. Useful as a comparison with marketed wellness cash-return models.
SIMERPU’s viewpoint
The conventional MERP and HRA overview gives readers a helpful comparison point for understanding medical-expense reimbursement. SIMERPU would use that foundation to examine how a marketed wellness arrangement is similar and how its payment process differs. Comparisons are most useful when they identify the actual expense and reimbursement mechanics.
What this source contributes
The conventional MERP and HRA explanation gives readers a familiar comparison for expense reimbursement.
What remains unanswered
A conventional-plan overview should not be assumed to establish the same mechanics or result for a wellness cash-return design.
Mardy Gould’s take
I would start with the simple question of what expense is being reimbursed. A conventional example can make that easier to understand. Then compare it with the proposed wellness arrangement step by step, so the employer sees both the similarities and any additional assumptions that need an explanation.
Questions I would bring to the conversation
1. What expense triggers reimbursement in the conventional example?
2. How does the proposed wellness arrangement differ?
3. Which additional funding or payment assumptions require support?
Mardy Gould · Co-Founder, SIMERPU →
What would change our assessment?
A documented comparison of expenses, entitlement and payment flow would clarify whether the overview supports the proposed arrangement.
Read the original source
The original author and publisher are credited below. Continue to their article, document or source page for the complete context.
Original Author: Shelby Tyler
Publisher: Difference Card
Original Publication Date: 2026-04-16
Read this alongside…
Each connection has a specific purpose. Compare the sources’ facts, positions and publication dates as you read.
26 CFR § 1.105-11 - Self-insured medical reimbursement plan
Cornell Legal Information Institute (reproduction)
Source position: Neutral / explanatory
Review the underlying self-insured-plan framework.
Read the SIMERPU recap →
26 CFR §1.105-2 — Amounts expended for medical care
eCFR / Office of the Federal Register
Source position: Neutral / explanatory
Read the reimbursement regulation directly.
Read the SIMERPU recap →
20 Questions about Establishing a Health & Wellness Program in the Workplace
The CPA Journal
Source position: Supportive
Compare the conventional explanation with a supportive WIMPER design.
Read the SIMERPU recap →
Keep learning with SIMERPU
Build your understanding with learning resources, the free Professional Roadmap and our approach to reviewing sources.
About this source
Original Updated Date: 2026-04-16 (page metadata)
Source Type: Vendor / adviser marketing or advocacy
Model Discussed: Conventional §105 MERP / HRA expense reimbursement
Position: Promotional
Period: Recent — 2023–2026
Retrieved: October 31, 2026
Research and date notes
Contextual comparison; does not establish equivalence to cash-return wellness models.
Each record identifies the material retrieved. SIMERPU’s viewpoint and Mardy Gould’s take are editorial commentary; the source-position label describes the original source’s stance. Read the original and its qualifications when evaluating a particular arrangement.
SIMERP
U
™
Understand the details. Lead with confidence.
© 2026 SIMERPU.