SIMERPU RESEARCH · SOURCE RECAP
Tax Avoidance Schemes: A Cautious Approach for Health Plan Sponsors
SIMERPU recap and commentary: Mardy Gould
Opened — main text retrieved
Quick recap
Four-page brief critiques tax-saving wellness programs and advises employers to examine vendor materials, disclaimers and legal analysis. Discusses earlier IRS double-dip guidance.
SIMERPU’s viewpoint
AHERN’s brief makes vendor materials and legal analysis useful subjects for an organized employer review. SIMERPU would compare the proposal, disclosures and supporting opinions to identify whether they describe the same arrangement. Consistency across those materials can make responsibilities and unresolved questions easier to understand.
What this source contributes
The brief encourages comparing sales materials, disclosures and legal analysis rather than reading each in isolation.
What remains unanswered
The employer must determine whether all those documents describe the same actual arrangement.
Mardy Gould’s take
I would place the proposal, disclosures and supporting analysis side by side. Do they describe the same payment, the same responsibilities and the same assumptions? That consistency check can reveal the questions an employer needs answered before the sales explanation becomes an operating commitment.
Questions I would bring to the conversation
1. Do the sales materials and legal analysis use the same facts?
2. What limitations appear in the disclosures?
3. Who resolves any inconsistency before implementation?
Mardy Gould · Co-Founder, SIMERPU →
What would change our assessment?
A reconciled document set and clear explanation of limitations would improve the basis for an employer-specific assessment.
Read the original source
The original author and publisher are credited below. Continue to their article, document or source page for the complete context.
Original Author: Not individually identified
Publisher: AHERN Insurance Brokerage — Benefits Brief
Original Publication Date: 2023-02
Read this alongside…
Each connection has a specific purpose. Compare the sources’ facts, positions and publication dates as you read.
Revenue Ruling 2002-3 — Reimbursement of pre-tax health insurance premiums
IRS
Source position: Neutral / explanatory
Review the historical premium-reimbursement issue.
Read the SIMERPU recap →
CCA 201622031 — Tax Treatment of Wellness Program Benefits and Employer Reimbursement of Premiums Provided Pre-tax Under a Section 125 Cafeteria Plan
IRS Office of Chief Counsel
Source position: Neutral / explanatory
Compare the later primary advice on wellness-related payments.
Read the SIMERPU recap →
CCA 202323006 — Tax Treatment of Employer-Funded, Insured, Fixed-Indemnity Wellness Policy
IRS Office of Chief Counsel
Source position: Neutral / explanatory
Test the proposed arrangement against the more recent IRS example.
Read the SIMERPU recap →
Keep learning with SIMERPU
Build your understanding with learning resources, the free Professional Roadmap and our approach to reviewing sources.
About this source
Original Updated Date: Not stated
Source Type: Benefits consultant / administrator
Model Discussed: §105 / §125 wellness premium-return arrangements
Position: Critical
Period: Recent — 2023–2026
Retrieved: October 31, 2026
Each record identifies the material retrieved. SIMERPU’s viewpoint and Mardy Gould’s take are editorial commentary; the source-position label describes the original source’s stance. Read the original and its qualifications when evaluating a particular arrangement.
SIMERP
U
™
Understand the details. Lead with confidence.
© 2026 SIMERPU.