SIMERPU RESEARCH · SOURCE RECAP
Employee Benefits Double Dips: What Tax Pros Should Watch
SIMERPU recap and commentary: Mardy Gould
Opened — main text retrieved
Quick recap
Reports renewed IRS concerns and explains the premium-reimbursement pattern. Urges tax practitioners to examine economic substance and avoid assuming that promised payroll savings establish compliance.
SIMERPU’s viewpoint
The tax-practitioner perspective highlights the need to understand economic substance behind a savings illustration. SIMERPU would connect that examination to the actual benefits, funding and payment conditions. A meaningful review should help both the employer and adviser explain what changes economically when the program is adopted.
What this source contributes
The practitioner perspective asks what changes economically when a marketed program is adopted.
What remains unanswered
The actual benefits, obligations and payment conditions must be examined before treating projected savings as evidence of support.
Mardy Gould’s take
I would ask the adviser and provider to explain the economic change in plain language. What new benefit or obligation exists, who pays for it and why does money return to the employee? A clear answer gives the employer something more useful than a tax-savings percentage and helps everyone examine the same transaction.
Questions I would bring to the conversation
1. What changes economically when the program begins?
2. What obligation supports each payment?
3. How do the documents and payroll records demonstrate that change?
Mardy Gould · Co-Founder, SIMERPU →
What would change our assessment?
Verified economic and payment facts could change the comparison with the patterns the article warns about.
Read the original source
The original author and publisher are credited below. Continue to their article, document or source page for the complete context.
Original Author: Dr. Christine Gervais, CPA
Publisher: Insightful Accountant
Original Publication Date: 2026-06-02
Read this alongside…
Each connection has a specific purpose. Compare the sources’ facts, positions and publication dates as you read.
Revenue Ruling 2002-3 — Reimbursement of pre-tax health insurance premiums
IRS
Source position: Neutral / explanatory
Read the original premium-reimbursement ruling.
Read the SIMERPU recap →
CCA 201622031 — Tax Treatment of Wellness Program Benefits and Employer Reimbursement of Premiums Provided Pre-tax Under a Section 125 Cafeteria Plan
IRS Office of Chief Counsel
Source position: Neutral / explanatory
Follow the later advice on rewards and returned premiums.
Read the SIMERPU recap →
CCA 202323006 — Tax Treatment of Employer-Funded, Insured, Fixed-Indemnity Wellness Policy
IRS Office of Chief Counsel
Source position: Neutral / explanatory
Compare the actual payment with the 2023 wellness-policy example.
Read the SIMERPU recap →
Keep learning with SIMERPU
Build your understanding with learning resources, the free Professional Roadmap and our approach to reviewing sources.
About this source
Original Updated Date: Not stated
Source Type: Professional accounting / benefits publication
Model Discussed: §125 wellness premium / reimbursement arrangements
Position: Critical
Period: Recent — 2023–2026
Retrieved: October 31, 2026
Each record identifies the material retrieved. SIMERPU’s viewpoint and Mardy Gould’s take are editorial commentary; the source-position label describes the original source’s stance. Read the original and its qualifications when evaluating a particular arrangement.
SIMERP
U
™
Understand the details. Lead with confidence.
© 2026 SIMERPU.